1
普魯斯特談的回憶與記憶是被區分出來的，他認為前者是非理智東西，後者稱為是意願性的記憶(mémoire volontaire)。「過去」是在一個不被注意的時刻回來，出現。須要一種機會，偶遇。
有那麼多的回憶上來，衝擊現在安逸生活著的我，恍若前天的讀書會，遠遠地觀看，了然於心的一種清朗，事隔多年之後。
2
過了就不再 or will be a kind of copy , then that will be totally
different , I never can use another period of memories to cover that time, 時間是不能被cover的。
就這樣，回憶不斷地上來，我懷疑人的腦容量有多大，它的結構如何，是否關上了幾扇門在不自覺的時後，或像普魯斯特對記憶的探討？我不知但我感謝這一切。
1
Marcel Proust considers nostalgia and recollection as
different things. He regards the former as illogical, and the latter as “mémoire
voluntaire”. The past resurfaces at an unnoticeable time. There must be a kind
of opportunity or a chance encounter.
With many memories stirring up within me, disturbing my
halcyon days, I think back to the study group that took place the day before
yesterday. Observing from afar, I begin to understand nostalgia more clearly
after a span of many years.
2
What has been can no longer be once more, or will be a kind
of copy, but that will be totally different. I never can use another period of
memories to cover that time, for it cannot be replaced.
Like this, the memories keep returning. I wonder how vast the
capacity of the human mind is and what is its structure. Have we unconsciously
closed a few doors while the memories return? Or, is it as Marcel Proust has
written about recollection? I do not know, but I am grateful for it all.
沒有留言:
張貼留言